havier
НаписатьО себе
I used to think writing a critical essay was just about having a strong opinion. If I believed in my argument enough, that should be enough, right? But then I started getting feedback that my essays felt unstructured—like I was making good points, but they weren’t connected in a way that built a solid argument.
That’s when I realized that a strong essay isn’t just about what I argue—it’s about how I build that argument. The structure is just as important as the ideas themselves. If I don’t organize my thoughts in a logical way, even the best points will lose impact.
Starting with a Clear ThesisEvery solid argument starts with a clear thesis statement—a sentence that lays out exactly what I’m trying to prove. The biggest mistake I used to make was keeping my thesis too vague.
For example, saying:
"Technology is changing education."
Sure, but how? For better or worse? A better thesis would be:
"While technology has improved access to education, it has also deepened socioeconomic inequalities by favoring students with more resources."
That way, my argument has direction—every point I make should either support or refine that idea.
Structuring the Body: The Logical Progression of IdeasOnce I have my thesis, the next challenge is how to organize my argument so it makes sense. A critical essay isn’t just a collection of points; it’s a step-by-step process of persuasion.
Here’s what I’ve learned works best:
Start with the strongest supporting argument. This gives my essay immediate momentum.Introduce counterarguments early. If I wait too long to address opposing views, it feels like I’m avoiding them.Build to a final, nuanced point. Instead of just repeating my argument, my final body paragraph should push the discussion forward—maybe by introducing a broader implication.I found that preparing for high school essays was where I first started recognizing this structure. Back then, I didn’t really think about how points connected; I just listed ideas. But once I started seeing arguments as a logical progression rather than separate pieces, my writing improved.
Counterarguments: Making My Argument Stronger by Questioning ItOne of the biggest shifts in my writing happened when I realized that acknowledging counterarguments doesn’t weaken my argument—it makes it stronger.
If I only present one side, my essay feels one-dimensional. But when I introduce a counterargument and then explain why it falls short, I’m proving that I’ve considered different perspectives.
For example, if I’m arguing that AI in hiring processes reinforces bias, I might acknowledge that:
"Some argue that AI removes human subjectivity from hiring."
Then, I counter with:
"However, since AI learns from existing data, it often inherits and amplifies biases rather than eliminating them."
Instead of avoiding opposing views, I use them to reinforce my own position.
The Role of Evidence: More Than Just Quoting SourcesWhen I first started writing critical essays, I thought using more sources meant making a stronger argument. But I’ve realized that it’s not just about having evidence—it’s about how I use it.
Every piece of evidence should have a clear purpose. Am I using it to support a point, refute a counterargument, or introduce a new perspective?Quoting isn’t enough—I have to explain. If I just throw in a quote and move on, I’m not really integrating it into my argument.Variety matters. If all my evidence comes from one source, my argument feels one-sided.If I’m writing about future-ready marketing education, I wouldn’t just reference a single study about digital trends. I’d combine academic research, industry reports, and real-world case studies to show a broader picture.
Transitions: Keeping the Argument FlowingOne of the hardest things about writing a critical essay is making sure the argument doesn’t feel choppy. If I just list points without transitions, my writing feels disconnected.
Some ways I keep my argument flowing:
Referencing previous points. (“Building on the idea that AI can reinforce bias, we also see this problem in predictive policing algorithms.”)Using clear signposting words. (“However,” “In contrast,” “This suggests that…”)Summarizing before moving to the next point. (“While this argument highlights the benefits, the next section will explore the ethical concerns.”)When the argument flows smoothly, the reader doesn’t get lost—and that makes my essay much more convincing.
The Conclusion: More Than Just a SummaryFor a long time, my conclusions were basically just my introduction rewritten in different words. But that’s not really the point of a conclusion. The best conclusions don’t just recap—they extend the argument.
What are the broader implications of my argument?What questions does this discussion open up?How does this topic connect to real-world issues?If my essay is about the rise of automation in the workplace, I don’t just restate that it’s happening. I might ask:
"As automation continues, how should education systems adapt to prepare students for an AI-driven economy?"
That way, my conclusion feels like a launching point rather than just an ending.
Final Thought: Writing as an Evolving SkillIf there’s one thing I’ve learned, it’s that structuring an argument isn’t a formula—it’s a skill that evolves. The more I write, the more I realize that there’s no single way to build an argument, but there are patterns that make writing stronger.
For me, the biggest shift happened when I stopped seeing essays as collections of ideas and started seeing them as carefully constructed arguments. Once I figured that out, writing didn’t just get easier—it got more interesting.
