Новости сайта "Велесова Слобода" Расология на английском языке
Недавно в Америке была издана книга Владимира Авдеева "Расология" на английском языке. Ниже можно прочитать рецензию Криса Бренда на английском.
---
---
Race realism, Russian-style
A review of: Rasologia.
By Vladimir Avdeyev
Moscow : Biblioteka Rasovoy Mysli. 2007, 2nd edition, 665 pp.
(With introductions by Andrey Savelev, a delegate of the Russian Duma
{Russian Parliament} and close personal friend of Avdeyev, and by Valeri
Solovei, a historian and member of the liberal Gorbachev Foundation.
The work is used as a textbook by the Department of Anthropology at
Moscow State University.)
Like it or not, Raciology is a book that illustrates how free speech
about Galtonian topics has sunk in the West – and resurfaced in Moscow
(where Communism had formerly banned scientific racism). In the West of
the past fifteen years, only mail-order and vanity publishers would
deliver the thoughts and evidence of academic race realists Art Jensen,
Phil Rushton, Richard Lynn, Glayde Whitney, Helmuth Nyborg and myself
to the Western public. In leading British universities, Geoffrey
Sampson, Satoshi Kanazawa, Armand Leroi, Frank Ellis and David Coleman
were all silenced by administrators when they talked of race; and I was
sacked. By contrast, in Vladimir Putin’s Russia, with its serious
concern with ethnic (often Muslim) problems and the disruptive advance
of Western ‘liberal interventionism’ and multicultural illusionism in
ex-Yugoslavia, Afghanistan and Iraq, the 46-year-old Vladimir Borisovich
Avdeyev, an engineer and Soviet Army officer by origin, later a
journalist, is allowed not only to edit the prestigious Athenaeum
Magazine but to have a publisher for his thoroughgoing racial analysis
of the world’s problems, combining lively (if traditional) ideas with
scholarly detail and vivid illustrations (not disdaining the splendidly
buttocked ‘Hottentot Venus’ who was displayed in Paris a century ago).
Avdeyev has mastered the history of Western racial thought from the
Enlightenment days of Immanuel Kant and David Hume to the twentieth
century and provided an unparalleled summary. Only John Baker’s Race
(1967, Oxford University Press -- but withdrawn after Baker’s death)
would hold a candle to Avdeyev’s magisterial effort.
Essentially, Avdeyev presents the Nordic peoples (including thereby
the Slavs and Caucasoid Russians) as the racial group responsible for
the bulk of culture, science and lawful governance in the world. He
writes (p. 156): “In the very heart of Europe -- at the time of the
formation of the first states, the creation of literacy, religion,
culture, technology and the bases of civilisation and jurisprudence --
there was no mention of Mongols, Negroes, and cross-breeds. All the epic
creation belonged entirely to the White man of pure race -- to his
will, genes, and far-sightedness.” (The term “Nordic race” was
apparently not coined by a German or by the mighty William McDougall (of
the universities of Cambridge, London, Oxford and Harvard), but by the
French-parented but Russian-born Joseph Deniker (1852-1918). And,
contrary to communist propaganda, Hitler apparently took a dim view only
of Bolsheviks, not of East Europeans in general: “The Third Reich did
not fight with Slavism, but with threat of bolshevism to the
fundamentals of European civilisation... It was the Bolsheviks, such as
Mehlis and open racists like Ilya Ehrenburg that those in Himmler’s
department described as “Untermenschen” in an exceedingly
anthropological sense of the word” (p.123).) In particular, Avdeyev
rehearses the Nordics’ economic and psychometric achievements and
provides physical measurements (including some of his own) which he
takes to attest Nordic superiority -- for Blacks, in particular, he
finds to be distinguished by strength and physicality rather than by
cranial development. In all this, Avdeyev is well in line with the
modern London School and it is good to think that Russian scholars and
students will be led by Raciology to join the great debate that Western
politicians, publishers and university authorities have done their best
to suppress.
It is true that Avdeyev will discompose Western race realists almost
as much as Western anti-racists. He takes a Nazistic line about the
Jews, reckoning them uncultured ‘nomads’ rather than recognizing (1)
their having been beaten into the wilderness by Rome, (2) their high
IQs, and (3) their ten-fold over-representation among Nobel prizewinners
(compared to other Americans). Strangely, he does not especially want
to criticize the Jewish elite for the manufacture of multiculturalism
and PeeCee in the West (not in Israel, of course, where strict race
realism rules) and its weird importation to the West, qua blessed
‘minorities’ which all should love, of millions of Jewry’s most deadly
Muslim enemies. He is equally dismissive of the Chinese -- verily
Johnsonian in his assertion of White superiority, even thinking some of
the higher Chinese (as also Egyptian) cultural attainments attributable
to stray Caucasoid genes, and not admitting the onward march of modern
China to make America its debtor. Avdeyev equally declines to follow
modern Western ‘out of Africa’ thinking about evolution, preferring to
believe that the main human races descended quite separately from
different types of ape. (He backs this up with reasoning involving the
proneness of different races to different diseases and tolerance to
different kinds of food, smell/taste [as identified in cannibals].) He
has a special line of his own in believing that the West, in its
right-handedness and left-to-right script, is thus importantly
distinguished from Muslims, Jews, Egyptians, homosexuals and the Chinese
– not apparently recalling that Africans are both conspicuously more
right-handed and less homosexual than Europeans. He also wants to derive
significance from Blacks’ tendencies to squat and from alleged Asian
proneness to melancholy. And he disdains Western convention in deploring
‘mixed marriages’ – believing such unions to yield unhealthy and
otherwise degenerate children (with large genetic ‘mongol stains’ on
their bottoms, at least in Brazil and Ecuador). (“The propaganda of free
love is of no satisfaction, since, in the long run, it destroys races.
Any search for sensory-biological diversity is fraught with
evolutionary irresponsibility”-- p.265. What Avdeyev makes of the
half-caste Tiger Woods, Colin Powell, Condoleeza Rice and Naomi
Campbell is not recorded….) Still more problematic, Avdeyev’s system of
referencing is non-Western, making it hard to follow up many of his
mentions of the works of the scholars and medics of Europe’s past who
did so much to identify the racial differences that had been strangely
ignored by Ancient Greece, Rome and Christianity. And, though Avdeyev’s
heart is surely in the right place about plucky Serbia, he doesn’t
admit that 25% of the Russian Army is now Muslim and thus multicultural
and incapable of deployment into Kosovo.
Nevertheless, Avdeyev’s thoughts and scholarship fully deserve
discussion and development rather than the suppression which they would
promptly receive if he attempted to publish in the West. Above all,
Avdeyev makes the strong case that ‘race is everything: literature,
science, art -- in a word, civilization -- depend on it,’ as Edinburgh
University’s top anatomist Robert Knox explained in 1850. And Avdeyev is
also properly agitated not so much about Negroes (among whom he lived
for a while, studying their varied tastes in cannibalism -- one
sub-section, 4-pages long, is called “Racial smells and passions of
cannibals”) as against Whites who betray their own race and science (for
Darwin’s great book was called On the Origin of Species by Means of
Natural Selection, or the Preservation of Favoured Races in the Struggle
for Life), wear dreadlocks or flip-flops, listen to heavily rhythmic
music, shake or otherwise draw attention to their genitals while
dancing and fail to appreciate Russia’s eugenic possibilities of
breeding from the likes of Red Army sex symbol Dana Borisova (e.g.
http://www.rususa.com/photo/bigphoto.asp-pid-517).
One only hopes his next work might concentrate -- as the London School
has done -- more on intelligence and IQ than on features of less
immediate relevance to explaining the human races’ different levels of
cultural advance.
CHRIS BRAND (author of ‘The g Factor’, 1996, Wiley DePublisher), Edinburgh, 2008.
---
Avdeyev’s book has eight chapters: 1) Racial Science and Anthropology:
What are the differences? 2) The Fair Race: Historiography and
Anthropology. 3) The Biological Foundation of the Northern Conception of
the World. 4) Thoughts about Racial Prejudices. 5) A New Paradigm in
Racial Science. 6) The Anti-Racial Myth of the “Melting Pot”. 7)
Racial-ideological Neurology, and finally, the striking chapter 8, A
Racial Theory of Time. The book contains many photographs and
illustrations.
BRITISH RACIOLOGY DETAILED AND APPLAUDED In Moscow, the ex-USSR fighter
pilot, historian and intellectual, Vladimir Avdeyev (previously author
of the 2007 Rasologia), brought out a 600-page account (with many
nicely engaging visual aids) of British race realism, beginning with
the likes of Edmund Burke, Adam Ferguson, Lord Kames, George Combe and
Robert Knox and leading on, via Sir Francis Galton, Karl Pearson, Sir
Arthur Keith and William McDougall, to the modern British personages of
and around the London School such as Sir Cyril Burt, John Randal
Baker, Hans Eysenck, Richard Lynn and myself (and also properly
mentioning distinguished overseas colleagues like R.B.Cattell and John
Ray). {It was of course a very striking testimony to the Western
disease of PeeCee that Vladimir’s book about British thinkers was
published in Moscow rather than in London or New York.}
---
(2011)
RASOLOGIA IN ENGLISH Raciology, a 2011 translation (by Patrick
Cloutier) of Vladmir Avdeyev’s masterly historical account of racial
thinking (see previous, including my 2008 review) was published by Lulu –
with a download available for £15-89. Highly recommended!