Отправляет email-рассылки с помощью сервиса Sendsay

Бюллетень "Lotus Notes CodeStore"

  Все выпуски  

LO51280: INOTES:WHEN A LONG DIRECTORY NAME IS USED, CANNNOT CHECK AN ATTACHMENT FILE NAME.


Рассылку ведет: Программист на Lotus NotesLotus CoderВыпуск No 336 от 2010-05-17
рассылка о программировании на Lotus Notes/Domino
Обсуждения на форумах, блогах. Примеры программного кода на LotusScript,@formula, Java

рассылка:выпускархивлентаблогсайт

Бюллетень "Lotus Notes CodeStore" Выпуск 13 от 21.04.2008

comp.soft.prog.lotuscodesrore

CodeStore. Примеры кодов

Еще примеры:
Больше кодов на сайтах:

Форумы.Свежи темы и обсуждения

Интересные темы:
Список форумов:

Tips. Советы

If you're running Quickr, this is the list of problems reported to Lotus Tech Support during the month of May. There are Technote links, training links, and more.

Read | Permalink
Chris Whisonant has finally discovered the 'truth' behind how WebSphere Application Server works. It may explain a great deal.

Read | Permalink


MARK YOUR CALENDAR FOR IN-DEPTH LOTUS TRAINING, MAY 12-14, 2010, BOSTON
Register by May 10, 2010, to save $100.

Brian O'Curran is excited about all the new stuff available on LotusLive Labs. He's posted quick descriptions and links for the new items.

Read | Permalink
Peter Presnell enjoys writing code but hates testing it. Therefore. He wrote a series of scripts to do the testing for him. He's posted some code and explains how the process works.

Read | Permalink
By Joe Dolittle

Are you sick of hearing Microsoft and Google crow about getting one company or another to abandon Notes and move to an alternative platform? We are, too. So this month, we're continuing out Migration May series with one of our favorite subjects: moving from Outlook to Notes.

Take back the story!

Now that Outlook 2010 is available, some Office users will need to decide if the upgrade is worth it to them. Rather than moving to another Outlook version, we recommend moving to Notes. There are a few ways to go about it, but the easiest is using the Notes migration tool NUPGRADE.EXE.

Tap here to learn about NUPGRADE as well as some commercial options.

Because I know you can't wait to find out how it's getting along, here's an update on the playhouse, which, as I should have known, is taking way longer than I'd first thought. Oh, and costing way more too.

IMAG0134

There are more photos here.

The 150 pound budget is now closer to 300. Thanks mainly to the addition of the "astro" turf, which ain't cheap.

So, yeah, it's turfed now and the house is built (there's even a roof on it). Left to do there's felting the roof, cladding the exterior, painting it all (covered in a tarpaulin at the moment) and making some windows and a door. So far I've spent 5 days on it and I reckon there'll be another two to go at least.

Not that I mind how long it's taking and costing. Most importantly the kids are loving it. I'm excited for them. My worst fear was that they'd show a fleeting interest and then act like it's not there. So far though we can't keep them off it. Mind you they do seem to just stand at the wall and watch in envy as the kids next door bounce around on their trampoline. How long before I hear "Daddy, me won won dose". Kids! Never happy!!

Anyway, I'll post a finished picture of it next Monday...

Click here to post a response

Еще советы:
Смотри советы на сайтах:

Блоги. Что обсуждают и пишут

Author: Chiang Kai Er
Tags: lotus notes client lotus_notes_improvement productivity usability user_experience
Idea:
When you receive a Lotus Notes Meeting Invite (as a participant), there are many occasions when you would like to have more people in your team attend the meeting with you.  This is a suggested Lotus Notes enhancement that would benefit many Notes users.
 

What would implementing this idea accomplish?

There is currently no easy way to add participants to a Lotus Notes Meeting Invite that is not initiated by you.  You can do one of the following, but they all have downsides: * Email the meeting organizer.  The meeting organizer would need to see your email, and manually copy and paste your suggested participants into the meeting invite, and then click on send. * Forward the meeting invite to the additional participants you would like to invite.  The meeting invite is simply forwarded as text and cannot be "accepted" by the recipients.  The recipients would need to create their own Calendar entries.  The meeting organizer is also not informed of these additional participants.  Should the meeting organizer make modifications to the meeting invite, these additional participants would not be informed. * Delegate the meeting invite to someone else.  This does not take care of the case when you would like to attend the meeting as well. If this idea is implemented, it would make it possible for any meeting participant to invite additional people to the meeting in a very simple way.  The additional participants would receive meeting invites, and the meeting organizer would be notified of the additional participants.

 

How would it work? How might it be implemented?

In the Lotus Notes Calendar entry, have an additional button for "Suggest More Invitees".  When the button is clicked, the user would be asked to add more invitees to the "to" and "cc" lists, in a similar way that a meeting organizer would go through.  When completed, the following would happen: 1. Meeting invite would be sent to the additional participants. 2. A "meeting update notice" would be sent to the meeting organizer, and that allows him to update his own invitee "to" and "cc" lists. Some meeting organizers may want to restrict the audience of their meeting, and would thus want to disable this "Suggest More Invitees" feature.  As such, we can add a "Prevent suggestion of more invitees" delivery option.

 

Why should IBM invest in implementing this idea?

This is a very useful Lotus Notes Calendering feature that most IBMers would find useful.  Customers of Lotus Notes would likely find it useful too as long as there is a need to organize big meetings for which the meeting organizer may not have a complete list of meeting participants.  For every meeting invite that needs to be forwarded to additional participants, this feature can save several person-hours, depending on the number of people involved.  It would also make Lotus Notes much more usable and live up to its name of a "collaboration platform".


Author: Chiang Kai Er
Tags: lotus notes client lotus_notes_improvement productivity usability user_experience
Idea:
When you receive a Lotus Notes Meeting Invite (as a participant), there are many occasions when you would like to have more people in your team attend the meeting with you.  This is a suggested Lotus Notes enhancement that would benefit many Notes users.
 

What would implementing this idea accomplish?

There is currently no easy way to add participants to a Lotus Notes Meeting Invite that is not initiated by you.  You can do one of the following, but they all have downsides:

* Email the meeting organizer.  The meeting organizer would need to see your email, and manually copy and paste your suggested participants into the meeting invite, and then click on send.

* Forward the meeting invite to the additional participants you would like to invite.  The meeting invite is simply forwarded as text and cannot be "accepted" by the recipients.  The recipients would need to create their own Calendar entries.  The meeting organizer is also not informed of these additional participants.  Should the meeting organizer make modifications to the meeting invite, these additional participants would not be informed.

* Delegate the meeting invite to someone else.  This does not take care of the case when you would like to attend the meeting as well. If this idea is implemented, it would make it possible for any meeting participant to invite additional people to the meeting in a very simple way.  The additional participants would receive meeting invites, and the meeting organizer would be notified of the additional participants.

 

How would it work? How might it be implemented?

In the Lotus Notes Calendar entry, have an additional button for "Suggest More Invitees".  When the button is clicked, the user would be asked to add more invitees to the "to" and "cc" lists, in a similar way that a meeting organizer would go through.  When completed, the following would happen:

1. Meeting invite would be sent to the additional participants.

2. A "meeting update notice" would be sent to the meeting organizer, and that allows him to update his own invitee "to" and "cc" lists. Some meeting organizers may want to restrict the audience of their meeting, and would thus want to disable this "Suggest More Invitees" feature.  As such, we can add a "Prevent suggestion of more invitees" delivery option.

 

Why should IBM invest in implementing this idea?

This is a very useful Lotus Notes Calendering feature that most IBMers would find useful.  Customers of Lotus Notes would likely find it useful too as long as there is a need to organize big meetings for which the meeting organizer may not have a complete list of meeting participants.  For every meeting invite that needs to be forwarded to additional participants, this feature can save several person-hours, depending on the number of people involved.  It would also make Lotus Notes much more usable and live up to its name of a "collaboration platform".

Internally within IBM, this idea is also posted on ThinkPlace as idea 123680.


Author: Chiang Kai Er
Tags: lotus notes client lotus_notes_improvement productivity usability user_experience
Idea:
There are many cases where wrong email recipients are chosen by Lotus Notes, especially if common names like "Michael" are entered.  Lotus Notes should be able to intelligently determine the recipients that the message is most likely intended for.
 

What would implementing this idea accomplish?

If this idea is implemented, it would reduce the likelihood of emails being sent to the wrong recipients.  This would, in turn:

* Prevent confidential information from being leaked to the wrong parties.
* Improve productivity since time is spent in making sure that recipients are correct.  If email is sent out wrongly, the wrong recipient's time is wasted in reading the email, and the intended recipient does not get the information in a timely manner.

How would it work? How might it be implemented?

Lotus Notes client should intelligently determine who is the most likely recipient when the name is being typed in the "To" or "cc" list.  Within IBM, it can make use of the following information:
* Direct linkage on Lotus Connections: people who are connected to the sender on Lotus Connections are most likely the intended recipients.
* Degrees of linkage on Lotus Connections: for people who are not directly connected to the sender on Lotus Connections, a person who is connected to a 2nd degree is more likely the intended recipient than a person who is connected to a 3rd degree, and so on.
* Tags on Lotus Connections: a person who has been tagged with info related to the subject and body of the message that is to be sent will likely be the intended recipient.
* Previous emails: previous emails that have been received or sent by the sender would indicate who are the more likely intended recipients.

A further enhancement would be to allow non-exact name search.  Since the search space is already narrowed, Lotus Notes should be able to make use of word sounds to suggest the closest match.

Why should IBM invest in implementing this idea?

This feature would make Lotus Notes much more usable and live up to its name of a "collaboration platform".

 


Author: Chiang Kai Er
Tags: lotus notes client lotus_notes_improvement productivity usability user_experience
Idea:
There are many cases where wrong email recipients are chosen by Lotus Notes, especially if common names like "Michael" are entered.  Lotus Notes should be able to intelligently determine the recipients that the message is most likely intended for.
 

What would implementing this idea accomplish?

If this idea is implemented, it would reduce the likelihood of emails being sent to the wrong recipients.  This would, in turn:

* Prevent confidential information from being leaked to the wrong parties.

* Improve productivity since time is spent in making sure that recipients are correct.  If email is sent out wrongly, the wrong recipient's time is wasted in reading the email, and the intended recipient does not get the information in a timely manner.

 

How would it work? How might it be implemented?

Lotus Notes client should intelligently determine who is the most likely recipient when the name is being typed in the "To" or "cc" list.  Within IBM, it can make use of the following information:

* Direct linkage on Lotus Connections: people who are connected to the sender on Lotus Connections are most likely the intended recipients.

* Degrees of linkage on Lotus Connections: for people who are not directly connected to the sender on Lotus Connections, a person who is connected to a 2nd degree is more likely the intended recipient than a person who is connected to a 3rd degree, and so on.

* Tags on Lotus Connections: a person who has been tagged with info related to the subject and body of the message that is to be sent will likely be the intended recipient.

* Previous emails: previous emails that have been received or sent by the sender would indicate who are the more likely intended recipients. A further enhancement would be to allow non-exact name search.  Since the search space is already narrowed, Lotus Notes should be able to make use of word sounds to suggest the closest match.

 

Why should IBM invest in implementing this idea?

This feature would make Lotus Notes much more usable and live up to its name of a "collaboration platform".

Internally within IBM, this idea is also posted on ThinkPlace as idea 128348.


Author: Chiang Kai Er
Tags: lotus notes client lotus_notes_improvement productivity usability user_experience
Idea:
There are many cases where wrong email recipients are chosen by Lotus Notes, especially if common names like "Michael" are entered.  Lotus Notes should be able to intelligently determine the recipients that the message is most likely intended for.
 

What would implementing this idea accomplish?

If this idea is implemented, it would reduce the likelihood of emails being sent to the wrong recipients.  This would, in turn:

* Prevent confidential information from being leaked to the wrong parties.

* Improve productivity since time is spent in making sure that recipients are correct.  If email is sent out wrongly, the wrong recipient's time is wasted in reading the email, and the intended recipient does not get the information in a timely manner.

 

How would it work? How might it be implemented?

Lotus Notes client should intelligently determine who is the most likely recipient when the name is being typed in the "To" or "cc" list.  Within IBM, it can make use of the following information:

* Direct linkage on Lotus Connections: people who are connected to the sender on Lotus Connections are most likely the intended recipients.

* Degrees of linkage on Lotus Connections: for people who are not directly connected to the sender on Lotus Connections, a person who is connected to a 2nd degree is more likely the intended recipient than a person who is connected to a 3rd degree, and so on.

* Tags on Lotus Connections: a person who has been tagged with info related to the subject and body of the message that is to be sent will likely be the intended recipient.

* Previous emails: previous emails that have been received or sent by the sender would indicate who are the more likely intended recipients. A further enhancement would be to allow non-exact name search.  Since the search space is already narrowed, Lotus Notes should be able to make use of word sounds to suggest the closest match.

 

Why should IBM invest in implementing this idea?

This feature would make Lotus Notes much more usable and live up to its name of a "collaboration platform".

Internally within IBM, this idea is also posted on ThinkPlace as idea 128348.


Author: Keith Brooks
Tags: inotes redirector webmail dwa
Idea:
This is something which could be done and should be done but hasn't.
Probably because big customers have the money for IP Sprayers/load balancers.
But if this is a thorn in your side as an admin or as a user vote for it.
In my session at The View conference 90% of the room wanted it.

Author: David Hablewitz
Tags: launch notes client
Idea:
Cache.ndk saves time for users, but creates many problems too.  Standard practice for any inexplicable client behavior is to delete cache.ndk first.    I suggest the client should start with a fresh one every time Notes is launched.  This would clear up MANY perceptions of Lotus Notes being "buggy" and eliminate many helpdesk calls.

Author: David Hablewitz
Tags: client install
Idea:
It is handy to have the incremental FP install kits for simple upgrades, but it creates difficulties not having a full install kit.  If you are upgrading from 8.0.x to 8.5.1 FP2, you need to run 2 installs.  If you are installing new software on a computer you need to run 2 installs.  In theory this should not be a big deal.  In practice it has many problems.  I would like to go back to the old way of releasing a full install kit as well as releasing the incremental kit.

Author: Peter Presnell
Tags: Files
Idea:
After adding a new version of a file it should be possible to edit the description assigned to a specific File

Author: Peter Presnell
Tags: Files
Idea:
While Connections allows me to remove all versions prior to a specific version, it does not permit me to remove a specific version.  E.g. If I loaded a new version of a file that is corrupted I can upload a new version but cannot remove the corrupted version without also removing all prior versions.

Еще записи:
Интересные блоги специалистов:

Статьи и Документация

When a long directory name is used, cannnot check an attachment file name.
Create a Desktop Settings Document to change/customize the Welcome Page (Assume
Domino server BLK_NETBUFFER memory leaks. Domino crashes with "PANIC: Insufficient memory" and high BLK_NETBUFFER allocations.
Why does the RTE not honor the "No proxy for these hosts or domains" list field when copying HTML from a local Intranet?
Также почитатай:
Найти документацию можно на сайтах:

В избранное